Gender Differences in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the Epi-Cardio Registry

Javier Mariani, Laura Antonietti, Carlos Tajer, Maximiliano De Abreu, Adrián Charask, Mario Silberstein, Juan Gagliardi, Hernán Doval

Abstract


BackgroundControversial evidence has been reported regarding gender bias in the managementof patients with acute coronary syndromes; thus, it is relevant to have data relatedto this topic in our country.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess gender differences in the management of acutecoronary syndromes in cardiovascular care units participating in the Epi-Cardio registry.MethodsWe included 8997 records of patients with diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes.Propensity score adjusted analyses and sensitivity analysis were performed.ResultsIn patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, women wereindependently associated with lower in-hospital indication of coronary angiography(OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.82), and lower use of IIb/IIIa inhibitors than men.After adjusted analyses, there were no significant differences between men andwomen in the use of reperfusion therapy for myocardial infarction or in in-hospitalmortality.At discharge, women were significantly less likely than men to receive prescriptionsfor beta-blockers and statins, and more likely to receive prescriptions for benzodiazepines.ConclusionsThese findings suggest gender bias in the treatment of patients with acute coronarysyndromes, evidenced by selection of a more conservative strategy and lower prescriptionof drugs recommended for secondary prevention in women. Differences betweengenders in the approach of acute coronary syndromes should be studied moredeeply, as the underutilization of evidence-based therapies could have an impact onwomen’s clinical outcomes.

References


Bibliografía

Ayanian JZ , Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 221-5.

Healy B. The Yentl Syndrome. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 274-275.

Tavris D, Shoaibi A, Chen AY, Uchida T, Roe M, Chen J. Gender differences in the treatment of non-ST -segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 2010; 33 (2): 99-103.

Poon S, Goodman S, Yan R, Bugiardini R, Bierman A, Eagle K et al. Bridging the gender gap: Insights from a contemporary analysis of sex-related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2012; 163:66-73.

Nguyen JT, Berger AK, Duval S, Luepker RV. Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2008; 155 (5): 862-868.

Vaccarino V, Rathore S S, Wenger NK, Frederick PD, Abramson JL,; Barron HV et al. Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. N Eng J Med 2005; 353:671-82.

Jani SM, Montoye C, Mehta R, Riba A, DeFranco A, Parrish R et al. Sex differences in the application of evidence-based therapies for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1164-1170.

Greenland P, Gulati M. Improving outcomes for women with myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1162-1163.

Radovanovic D, Erne P, Urban P, Bertel O, Rickli H, Gaspoz JM. Gender differences in management and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results on 20.290 patients from the AMIS Plus Registry. Heart 2007; 93: 1369-1375.

Milcent C, Dormont B, Durand-Zaleski I, Steg PG. Gender differences in hospital mortality and use of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: Microsimulation Analysis of the 1999 Nationwide French Hospitals Database. Circulation 2007; 115: 833-839.

Roeters van Lennep JE, Zwinderman AH, Roeters van Lennep HWO, Westerveld HE, Plokker HWM, Voors AA et al. Gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease from 1981 to 1997. No evidence for the Yentl syndrome. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 911-918.

Alfredsson J, Lindbäck J, Wallentin L, Swahn E. Similar outcome with an invasive strategy in men and women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: From the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) . Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 3128-3136.

Möllmann H, Liebetrau C, Nef H, Hamm C. The Swedish paradox: or is there really no gender difference in acute coronary syndromes? Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 3070-3072.

Alfredsson J, Stenestrand U, Wallentin L, Swahn E. Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 2007; 93: 1357-1362.

Gagliardi J; de Abreu M; Mariani JA; Silberstein M; de Sagastizábal D; Salzberg S y col. Motivos de ingreso, procedimientos, evolución y terapéuticas al alta de 54.000 pacientes ingresados a unidades de cuidados intensivos cardiovasculares en la Argentina. Seis años del Registro Epi-Cardio. Rev Argent Cardiol 2012; 80: 446-54.

Rosembaum PR; Rubin DB. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 1983; vol. 70; 1: 41-55.

Hvelplund A, Galatius S, Madsen M, Rasmussen J, Rasmussen S, Madsen JK et al. Women with acute coronary syndrome are less invasively examined and subsequently less treated than men. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 684-690.

Anderson DR, Pepine CJ. Gender Differences in the Treatment for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Bias or Biology? Circulation 2007; 115: 823-826.

Peterson ED, Shah BR, Parsons L, Pollack CV, French WJ, Canto JG et al. Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J 2008; 156 (6): 1045-1055.

Kumbhani DJ, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Peackok WF et al. Predictors of adherence to performance measures in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2013; 126(1):74.e1-9.

Akhter N, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, Piana RN, Kao J, Shroff A. Gender differences among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the American College of Cardiology- National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Am Heart J 2009; 157: 141-8.

Januzzi J, Stern T, Pasternak R, DeSanctis R. The influence of anxiety and depression on outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med, 2000; 160: 1913-1920.

Williams D, Bennett, K, Feely J. Evidence for an age and gender bias in the secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 55: 604-608.

Alfredsson J, Swahn E. Management of acute coronary syndromes from a gender perspective. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 2010; 24: 719–728.

Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet 2001; 358: 397-400.

Risberg G, Hamberg K, Johansson E. Gender perspective in medicine: a vital part of medical scientific rationality. A useful model for comprehending structures and hierarchies within medical science. BMC Medicine 2006; 4:20.

Tajer D. Los imaginarios profesionales en la construcción del "coronario" y la "coronaria". Paidós Tramas Sociales. Heridos corazones. Vulnerabilidad coronaria en varones y mujeres. 1ª ed. Buenos Aires 2009, 201-257. ISBN 978-950-12-4557-8.

Rosman S, Le Vaillant M, Palletier-Fleury N. Gaining insight into benzodiazepine prescribing in general practice in France: a data-based study. BMC Family Practice 2011; 12:28.

Sonnenberg CM, Bierman E. Deeg D, Comis H, van Tilburg W, Beekman H. Ten-year trends in benzodiazepine use in the Dutch population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 2011; 47: 293–301.

Sachdeva A, Cannon CP, Deedwania PC, Labresh KA, Smith SC Jr, Dai D et al. Lipid levels in patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease: an analysis of 136,905 hospitalizations in Get With The Guidelines. Am Heart J 2009; 57(1): 111-117.


Full Text

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Licencia Creative Commons
The documents published in this journal are under the licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir-Igual 2.5 Argentina.

Revista argentina de cardiología. ISSN en línea 1850-3748. Argentine journal of cardiology (English ed. Online ISSN 2314-2286) Sociedad Argentina de Cardiología. Azcuénaga 980 (C1115AAD),Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, República Argentina. Tel. (54 11) 4961-6027/8/9 Fax: 4961-6020 www.sac.org.ar revista@sac.org.ar